How West Hartford Public Schools Compares to Surrounding School Districts
A summary of 10 measures comparing West Hartford with Avon, Simsbury, Farmington, Glastonbury, and South Windsor
Last updated: September 3, 2026
Written by: Scott Carter
West Hartford's combination of a steep mill rate and high property values makes it one of the most expensive places to live in Connecticut. The mill rate has increased 17.4% since 2022, resulting in significant increases in property taxes. A major driver of those tax increases has been the growing demands of the public schools, which receive 58% of the town's annual budget. Their budget has increased from $181 million in 2022 to $226 million in fiscal year 2027, an increase of nearly 25%, while serving fewer students than in 2022.
Let's take a closer look at the performance of West Hartford Public Schools compared to other nearby school divisions, all of which are in towns with far lower tax rates.
There are two significant differences between West Hartford Public Schools and the other divisions in our comparison. At 9,069 students in 2025-26, West Hartford is the largest of the school divisions by far - roughly 61% more than Glastonbury, the next largest, and three times Avon's 2,981.
Connecticut counts a student as high needs if they qualify for free or reduced-price meals, are a multilingual learner, or have an Individualized Education Program, and West Hartford has the highest share of the six. High-needs students make up 40.5% of those enrolled there, against 33.6% in South Windsor, 31.6% in Farmington, 30.7% in Simsbury, 26.8% in Glastonbury, and 24.8% in Avon. All six sit well below Connecticut's own 56% high-needs rate. What follows, in other words, is not a comparison between districts serving the same student makeup. The districts were chosen for their proximity to Hartford, making them likely candidates for new families moving to the area.
Across most measures, there is a consistent pattern: West Hartford ranks at or near the bottom of this group in current test results, and at or near the top in rate of improvement.
On the state's Performance Index, which scores districts from 0 to 100 on test results, West Hartford placed last among the six in reading, math, and science in 2025-26. Its scores rose in all three subjects, continuing a steady climb - reading from 72.4 to 74.5 and math from 69.4 to 71.5 since 2022-23 — but the rest of the group moved up too. Five of the six divisions now clear Connecticut's target of 75 in every subject, up from three the year before. West Hartford is the only district in the group below the target, and it is below in all three subjects.
On the state's overall Accountability Index, it again placed lowest, but it gained 5.1 points over two years, more than double the improvement of any other district in the group, narrowing the distance to top-ranked Farmington from 10.3 points to 6.0. That measure is still reported through 2024-25.
West Hartford had the highest rate of chronic absenteeism among the six in 2022-23, at 14.8 percent, and cut it to 9.9 percent by 2024-25 — the largest improvement in the group. In 2025-26 that progress stalled: the rate ticked up to 10.0 percent, and among high-needs students it rose more clearly, from 17.7 to 19.5 percent. Four of the six districts improved that year and the state improved as well, so West Hartford lost ground relative to its neighbors. In 2025-26, West Hartford and Avon are essentially tied for the highest rate of chronic absenteeism at 10%.
All six districts outperform Connecticut as a whole on essentially every measure. State averages provide useful scale: the statewide Accountability Index was 71.8 in 2024-25, below all six. Statewide, 47.2 percent of students met the college-and-career-readiness exam benchmark; in this group, the range was 64.2 to 75.0 percent.
West Hartford also has a significant achievement gap: high-needs students sit 14.3 points below the district average in reading and 14.1 in math, wider than the state's 9.8 and 10.5, though not the widest in this group - Avon's are.
Another area in need of continued improvement is math growth. Connecticut reports growth as the average percentage of each student's individual growth target that was achieved - not the share of students who met their target, which the state reports as a separate figure. On that measure, West Hartford's math result had fallen three years running, from 68.7 to 65.9. In 2025-26 it rose to 68.1, roughly back to where it started, even as the statewide average slipped from 62.3 to 60.9. West Hartford remains last of the six in math, but it is now moving in the right direction. Its reading result held at 66.1, second-highest in the group.
West Hartford spends the most per pupil of any district in the group — $22,971 in 2024-25, and the largest increase over three years, both in dollars and percentage terms. It sits just above the statewide average of $22,721. How that money is divided is broadly conventional: a slightly larger share to instruction than the state as a whole and a slightly smaller share to administration and building operations.
If you're looking for a more apples-to-apples comparison for West Hartford in terms of student count or the percentage of high-needs students, you won't find one in Connecticut. West Hartford is unique in that it has a large student population with a high-needs percentage of about 40%. Districts its size are either affluent suburbs near 33% or cities above 60%.
The closest comparisons would be Southington (roughly 6,200 students and a high-needs percentage of 38.1) and Rocky Hill (about 2,500 students and a high-needs percentage of 39.9). West Hartford is pretty much tied with Rocky Hill in ELA at 74.5% compared to their 74.9%, both better than Southington's 72.8%, but trails the other two divisions in most other metrics, such as math, science, and growth. West Hartford also has much larger achievement gaps in ELA and math than the other two districts, at 13.5% and 13.6% compared to theirs, which are both about three points better in math and four points better in ELA.
Data: CT EdSight, Connecticut State Department of Education. 2022-23 through 2025-26.
A note on timing: test-based results for 2025-26 were published on August 31, 2026, and the Performance Index, Academic Growth, and Chronic Absenteeism charts below reflect them. The remaining measures — accountability, graduation, college readiness, the achievement gap, and spending - are still reported through 2024-25, because the state releases those later in the year. Additional data can be found on the School + State Finance Project website.
Regional District Performance Index (DPI)
Comparing West Hartford's ELA, Math, and Science performance against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | ELA | Math | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 74.5 | 71.5 | 72.7 |
| Avon | 79.1 | 76.7 | 76.6 |
| Simsbury | 79.5 | 76.8 | 79.1 |
| Farmington | 77.6 | 76.8 | 80.2 |
| Glastonbury | 76.9 | 76.7 | 79.6 |
| South Windsor | 75.3 | 75.1 | 77.0 |
| State Target (75) | 75.0 | ||
Source: CT EdSight — Performance Index . Most recent published year: 2025-26.
Performance Index
This is the state's summary score for how students perform on annual tests, on a 0-to-100 scale. Connecticut's stated target is 75 in every subject.
In 2025-26 West Hartford scored 74.5 in reading, 71.5 in math, and 72.7 in science — the lowest of the six districts in all three. Five of the six now exceed the state's target of 75 in every subject, up from three the year before; West Hartford is the only one that does not, and it falls short in all three.
Its scores have risen steadily and rose again in the most recent year: reading from 72.4 to 74.5 and math from 69.4 to 71.5 since 2022-23. Science recovered from a dip, moving from 71.4 to 72.7 across the period.
Context: this measure reflects how students score, which is influenced by the population a district enrolls as well as by the teaching. The Academic Growth measure below is designed to separate those two things.
Academic Growth
How much West Hartford students improve over a year, compared against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | ELA Growth | Math Growth |
|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 66.1 | 68.1 |
| Avon | 74.7 | 80.9 |
| Simsbury | 65.7 | 70.7 |
| Farmington | 62.6 | 70.5 |
| Glastonbury | 63.7 | 70.0 |
| South Windsor | 62.6 | 69.9 |
| State Average (ELA) | 59.3 | |
| State Average (Math) | 60.9 | |
Source: CT EdSight — Smarter Balanced Growth Model . Most recent published year: 2025-26.
Academic Growth
Rather than asking how high students scored, this asks how much they improved over the year against an individual target set for each student. A score of 100 means students met their growth targets in full. It matters because it is far less affected by which families live in a district.
The picture here differs from the achievement scores, and the two subjects diverge.
In reading, West Hartford scored 66.1 in 2025-26, second of the six behind Avon's 74.7 and well above the state's 59.3. It climbed from 60.4 three years ago and has now held steady for two years.
In math, West Hartford scored 68.1 — last of the six, behind Avon at 80.9. But the direction has changed. Math growth had fallen three years running, from 68.7 to 65.9; in 2025-26 it rose 2.2 points, roughly back to its 2022-23 level. Statewide math growth fell over the same year, from 62.3 to 60.9, so West Hartford gained ground against the state while remaining last in this group.
This is the clearest instance where growth tells a different story than achievement: West Hartford students gain reading ground faster than most of their neighbors, and math ground more slowly.
Next Generation Accountability System
Comparing West Hartford's overall Accountability Index against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | Accountability Index |
|---|---|
| West Hartford | 79.3 |
| Avon | 81.0 |
| Simsbury | 81.4 |
| Farmington | 85.3 |
| Glastonbury | 82.3 |
| South Windsor | 82.3 |
| State Average | 71.8 |
Source: CT EdSight — Next Generation Accountability Results . Most recent published year: 2024-25, released October 30, 2025. The 2025-26 accountability results are due in the autumn.
Next Generation Accountability System
Connecticut's broadest single measure of a district. It folds twelve separate indicators into one number — test scores, academic growth, attendance, graduation, college and career readiness, physical fitness, and arts participation among them — and reports the result as the percentage of possible points a district earned. Several of those indicators appear as their own charts on this page; this is the composite.
West Hartford scored 79.3 in 2024-25, the lowest of the six and the only one below 80. Farmington led at 85.3, followed by Glastonbury and South Windsor at 82.3, Simsbury at 81.4, and Avon at 81.0. All six sit comfortably above the statewide 71.8.
The movement is the notable part. West Hartford gained 5.1 points in two years, rising from 74.2 to 79.3. No other district in the group gained more than 2.0, and the state as a whole gained 2.5. The distance between West Hartford and top-ranked Farmington narrowed from 10.3 points to 6.0 over the same period — West Hartford closing roughly two-fifths of the gap.
Context: the system dates from 2015-16 and was suspended for two years during the pandemic, with no results published for 2019-20 or 2020-21. Reporting resumed in 2021-22, so the three years shown here are the full run of post-pandemic data. A district's score reflects the students it enrolls as well as how it teaches them, which is worth reading alongside the demographics chart.
Total Spend Per Pupil
Comparing West Hartford's per-pupil expenditures against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | Spend Per Pupil |
|---|---|
| West Hartford | $22,971 |
| Avon | $22,569 |
| Simsbury | $22,059 |
| Farmington | $21,032 |
| Glastonbury | $22,603 |
| South Windsor | $18,815 |
| State Average | $22,721 |
Source: CT EdSight — Per Pupil Expenditures by Function (District) . Most recent published year: 2024-25.
Total Spend Per Pupil
Total spending divided by enrollment, covering local, state, and federal money. It excludes debt, most construction, and the state's contribution to teacher pensions.
West Hartford spent $22,971 per student in 2024-25, the highest of the six and $250 above the statewide average of $22,721. South Windsor spent least at $18,815 — some $4,150 less per student.
West Hartford's spending rose fastest in the group, up $2,267 or 10.9 percent over three years, against a statewide increase of 7.5 percent. Farmington's rose least, at 4.3 percent.
Chronic Absenteeism
The share of students missing a tenth or more of the school year, compared against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | All Students | High Needs Students |
|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 10.0 | 19.5 |
| Avon | 10.1 | 20.8 |
| Simsbury | 7.9 | 14.5 |
| Farmington | 7.5 | 15.9 |
| Glastonbury | 6.5 | 13.9 |
| South Windsor | 9.3 | 17.5 |
| State Average (All) | 16.4 | |
| State Average (High Needs) | 23.8 | |
Source: CT EdSight — Chronic Absenteeism . Most recent published year: 2025-26.
Chronic Absenteeism
The share of students who miss at least 10 percent of the days they are enrolled, for any reason, excused or not. Roughly 18 missed days in a typical year. Lower is better.
West Hartford was at 10.0 percent in 2025-26, second highest of the six and a fraction below Avon's 10.1. Glastonbury was lowest at 6.5.
The longer trend is favorable but the most recent year is not. West Hartford fell from 14.8 percent to 9.9 over three years — the largest reduction in the group — then ticked back up to 10.0. Among high-needs students the reversal is clearer, rising from 17.7 to 19.5 percent. Four of the six districts improved in 2025-26, and the state improved from 17.2 to 16.4 percent, so West Hartford lost relative ground. South Windsor was the only other district to move backwards.
For high-needs students the figures are higher everywhere. West Hartford's rate for that group was 19.5%, the highest of the six, against a state figure of 23.8%.
Context: chronic absenteeism roughly doubled statewide during the pandemic and has been falling since. All six districts remain far below the state's 16.4%.
College and Career Readiness
Access to advanced coursework, and how many students meet the readiness benchmark, compared against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | Taking CCR Coursework | Meeting Exam Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 92.9 | 68.9 |
| Avon | 97.2 | 71.7 |
| Simsbury | 94.4 | 64.2 |
| Farmington | 93.7 | 75.0 |
| Glastonbury | 85.0 | 70.6 |
| South Windsor | 96.6 | 69.7 |
| State Average (Coursework) | 92.4 | |
| State Average (Exams) | 47.2 | |
Source: CT EdSight — Next Generation Accountability Results . Most recent published year: 2024-25, released October 30, 2025. The 2025-26 accountability results are due in the autumn.
College and Career Readiness
Two related figures for high school students. The first is the share of eleventh and twelfth graders taking at least one Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, dual-enrollment, or workplace-experience course. The second is the share meeting the state's readiness benchmark on the associated exams.
West Hartford enrolled 92.9% of upperclassmen in at least one such course in 2024-25, essentially at the state average of 92.4 and fifth of the six. Avon led at 97.2; Glastonbury was the outlier at 85.
On the exams, West Hartford's 68.9% placed fifth, behind Farmington's 75.0. Every district in this group far exceeded the state's 47.2%.
Access is close to universal in five of these six districts, so the exam figure carries most of the useful signal. West Hartford's has risen from 65.8 to 68.9 over three years.
Graduation and Postsecondary Outcomes
Four-year graduation rates and college enrollment, compared against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | 4-Year Graduation | Postsecondary Entrance |
|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 93.7 | — |
| Avon | 95.0 | — |
| Simsbury | 96.4 | — |
| Farmington | 97.5 | — |
| Glastonbury | 96.6 | — |
| South Windsor | 97.3 | — |
| State Average (Graduation) | 91.2 | |
| State Average (Postsecondary) | — | |
Source: CT EdSight — Four-Year Graduation Rate and College Entrance . Graduation is current through 2024-25. College entrance lags a year and is published only through 2023-24.
Graduation and Postsecondary Outcomes
Graduation is the share of first-time ninth graders earning a standard diploma within four years. Postsecondary entrance is the share of graduates enrolling at a two- or four-year college within a year of leaving.
West Hartford graduated 93.7% of its 2024-25 cohort, lowest of the six but above the state's 91.2%. Farmington led at 97.5%. West Hartford's rate has edged up from 92.2% the previous year.
In 2023-24, the most recent year available, West Hartford sent 81.0% of graduates on to a two- or four-year institution, fifth of the six — Simsbury was lower at 78.4 — against a state figure of 67.0%. Avon led at 88.4%.
All six districts cluster near the top on graduation, so differences there are small. College enrollment separates them more.
Achievement Gap
The performance gap between high-needs students and their peers, compared against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | ELA Gap | Math Gap |
|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Avon | 15.0 | 16.3 |
| Simsbury | 13.0 | 14.0 |
| Farmington | 12.4 | 13.6 |
| Glastonbury | 13.5 | 15.1 |
| South Windsor | 12.1 | 12.7 |
| Statewide Gap (ELA) | 9.8 | |
| Statewide Gap (Math) | 10.5 | |
Source: CT EdSight — Next Generation Accountability Results . Most recent published year: 2024-25, released October 30, 2025. The 2025-26 accountability results are due in the autumn.
Achievement Gap
The distance between a district's overall Performance Index and the index for its high-needs students, it represents how far behind the district average those students sit. Lower is better. High needs covers students from low-income families, multilingual learners, and students with disabilities.
West Hartford's high-needs students score 14.3 index points below the district average in reading and 14.1 below in math. Avon has the widest gaps of the six — 15.0 in reading and 16.3 in math — with South Windsor narrowest at 12.1 and 12.7.
For scale, the statewide gap is 9.8 in reading and 10.5 in math. West Hartford's gap is wider than the state on both, as are all of the other districts here.
The gap is closing slowly: down 0.3 points in reading and 1.2 in math since 2022-23.
West Hartford's gaps are wider than the state's on both measures, though not the widest in this group, and it is worth reading alongside district size - West Hartford serves substantially more students than any other district here.
Where the Money Goes
How each district divides its spending, compared against surrounding municipalities and the state as a whole.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | Instruction | Student Support | Instructional Support | Administration | Operations and Maintenance | Transportation | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 63.5 | 8.0 | 3.4 | 10.9 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 0.9 |
| Avon | 64.7 | 7.7 | 1.5 | 10.6 | 8.4 | 5.1 | 2.1 |
| Simsbury | 61.3 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 8.9 | 9.3 | 4.3 | 1.2 |
| Farmington | 61.4 | 9.3 | 4.2 | 9.6 | 10.6 | 4.9 | 0.0 |
| Glastonbury | 61.8 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 8.6 | 11.2 | 4.7 | 1.9 |
| South Windsor | 62.3 | 9.6 | 2.4 | 13.0 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 0.0 |
| Connecticut | 60.5 | 7.9 | 3.7 | 11.5 | 9.3 | 6.2 | 1.0 |
Source: CT EdSight — Per Pupil Expenditures by Function (District) . Most recent published year: 2024-25.
Where the Money Goes
The same spending, shown as proportions rather than dollars. Every bar totals 100 percent, so this chart is about priorities, not amounts.
West Hartford directs 63.5 percent of spending to instruction, second highest of the six behind Avon's 64.7 and above the state's 60.5 percent. It spends 10.9 percent on administration, below the state's 11.5, and 7.5 percent on operating and maintaining buildings — the lowest share in the group, against a state figure of 9.3 percent.
The widest variation among these districts is in instructional support — coaching, curriculum, and professional development — which ranges from 1.5 percent in Avon to 7.3 percent in Simsbury. West Hartford sits at 3.4 percent. Administration ranges from 8.6 percent in Glastonbury to 13.0 percent in South Windsor.
Total spending, 2024-25
| District | Total spending | Students | Per pupil |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | $217,416,270 | 9,465 | $22,971 |
| Glastonbury | $132,115,403 | 5,845 | $22,603 |
| South Windsor | $99,420,872 | 5,284 | $18,815 |
| Simsbury | $93,706,071 | 4,248 | $22,059 |
| Farmington | $90,100,705 | 4,284 | $21,032 |
| Avon | $71,273,526 | 3,158 | $22,569 |
| Connecticut | $12,162,776,202 | 535,309 | $22,721 |
These totals largely reflect how many students each district educates. West Hartford’s budget is roughly three times Avon’s because it enrolls roughly three times as many children; per student, the two are within $400 of each other. The per-pupil column is the fairer comparison, and the chart above shows how each district divides whatever it spends.
Source: CT EdSight — Per Pupil Expenditures by Function (District), Total row. Covers all funding sources and both regular and special education. Excludes debt service, capital other than equipment, adult education, community services, non-locally-funded food services, and the state’s contribution to the Teachers’ Retirement Fund.
Who the Districts Serve
The share of students in each group that Connecticut counts as high needs, compared against surrounding municipalities.The interactive chart could not be loaded. The same figures are available in the data table below.
View data table
| District | ML Learners | Free or Reduced-Price Meals | Students with IEPs |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Hartford | 8.6 | 28.5 | 18.6 |
| Avon | 3.2 | 13.4 | 12.8 |
| Simsbury | 2.2 | 16.7 | 17.8 |
| Farmington | 5.9 | 20.0 | 13.4 |
| Glastonbury | 3.8 | 15.4 | 14.0 |
| South Windsor | 9.4 | 18.5 | 12.9 |
| Connecticut Average (ML Learners) | 11.3 | ||
| Connecticut Average (Free or Reduced-Price Meals) | 44.8 | ||
| Connecticut Average (Students with IEPs) | 18.5 | ||
Source: CT EdSight — District Profile and Performance Report . Enrollment as reported on October 1, 2024. EdSight serves only the current edition of this report, so earlier years are not shown.
Who the Districts Serve
Connecticut counts a student as high needs if they qualify for free or reduced-price meals, are multilingual learners, or have an Individualized Education Program. Districts are measured on how well they serve this group, and the state's achievement gap calculation rests on it.
West Hartford has the highest share of the six. High-needs students make up 40.5% of those enrolled there, against 33.6% in South Windsor, 31.6% in Farmington, 30.7% in Simsbury, 26.8% in Glastonbury, and 24.8% in Avon. Behind that figure, 28.5% of West Hartford students qualify for free or reduced-price meals — more than double Avon's 13.4% — and 18.6% have an IEP, the highest here. Only on multilingual learners does another district rank higher, South Windsor at 9.4% to West Hartford's 8.6%. All six fall well below Connecticut's own 44.8% meal-eligibility rate. The three groups overlap, so they cannot be added together.
This chart measures who a district serves, not how well it teaches. It is context for the others — particularly the Performance Index and the Achievement Gap, where a district enrolling 41% high-needs students and one enrolling 24% are not being compared on equal footing.